Policy@Manchester Articles

Expert insight, analysis and comment on key public policy issues

  • All Posts
  • UK Politics
  • Energy and Environment
  • Growth and Inclusion
  • Health and Social Care
  • Urban
  • Science and Engineering
Policy@Manchester Articles: Whitehall Watch
You are here: Home / Whitehall Watch / Ten ideas for Democratising and Modernising Public Spending in the UK

Ten ideas for Democratising and Modernising Public Spending in the UK

Colin Talbot By Colin Talbot Filed Under: Whitehall Watch Posted: March 1, 2013

The Fabian Commission on Future Spending Choices asked me for some ideas about the public spending process in the UK and here are my suggestions for reform:

1) Put [3 yearly] Spending Reviews (SRs) on a statutory basis to cement their role in the spending process (and stop governments messing around with the timings unless an emergency).

[SRs have varied in length from 2 to 3 years in practice and 3 to 4 years in intent. I’m open as to which precise cycle we adopt, but would suggest 3 years].

2) Include performance and efficiency objectives within the SRs.

3) Require the publication of a clear Fiscal Plan alongside the SR, including a set of Fiscal Rules and a clear taxation strategy for the next [3 years].

4) Require the publication – alongside the new draft SR – of the government’s evaluation of the last one, including an independent assessment by the Parliamentary Budget Office (see below).

5) Include in the SR legislation a requirement to publish draft plans for public consultation, to be organised through the Select Committees of Parliament.

6) Have a vote of the House of Commons on the final Spending and Fiscal Plans.

7) Remove the convention that finance bills cannot be amended and require the Chancellor to show how annual budget bills implement, or deviate from, the 3 year Spending and Fiscal Plans.

8) Create a Parliamentary Budget Office, along the lines of the USA’s CBO, and subsume the OBR into it. Mandate and resource it to carry out independent assessments of major spending plans, policy changes and proposals, including from Opposition parties as well as government. Give it a role supporting Select Committee’s and independence to initiate its own studies.

9) Change reporting requirements so that government departments have to report clearly against SR objectives, plans and performance.

10) Introduce a set of Standards for Public Performance Reporting (including so-called efficiency gains) that applies to all public bodies (see my White Paper on this).

So there’s a few ideas – all comments, as usual, welcome.

About Colin Talbot

Colin Talbot is a Professor of Government, a former Specialist Advisor to the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee and the Public Administration Select Committee and has appeared as expert witness many times in Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and NI Assembly. He's also advised Governments from the USA to Japan.

Our RSS feed

Receive our latest content and timely updates by subscribing to our RSS feed.

 Subscribe in your reader

More from this author

  • The UK after the Referendum: all that is solid melts into air…..
  • SR2015: £35bn on debt interest? But what about the £375bn held by the Bank of England?
  • SR2015: Spending: Is 36% of GDP still his target?

Become a contributor

Would you like to write for us on a public policy issue? Get in touch with a member of the team, ask for our editorial guidelines, or access our online training toolkit (UoM login required).

Disclaimer

Articles give the views of the author, and are not necessarily those of The University of Manchester.

Policy@Manchester

Manchester Policy Articles is an initiative from Policy@Manchester. Visit our web site to find out more

Contact Us

policy@manchester.ac.uk
t: +44 (0) 161 275 3038
The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Copyright © 2025 · Policy Blog 2 on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in