Policy@Manchester Articles

Expert insight, analysis and comment on key public policy issues

  • All Posts
  • UK Politics
  • Energy and Environment
  • Growth and Inclusion
  • Health and Social Care
  • Urban
  • Science and Engineering
Policy@Manchester Articles: Whitehall Watch
You are here: Home / Whitehall Watch / Local Trade Union Officials and “Facilities Time”

Local Trade Union Officials and “Facilities Time”

Colin Talbot By Colin Talbot Filed Under: Whitehall Watch Posted: April 11, 2012

An interesting piece by UNISON local government leader Heather Wakefield raises an obvious contradiction in Coalition Government policy.
On the one-hand, they want to abolish the tradition of having local unpaid trade union officials granted waht is called “facilities time” – that is time off their normal work to undertake trade union duties. At the same time the Coalition wants locally agreed pay rates. Hows that going to happen without local trade union officials to negotiate it.
First, disclosure – I was a given part-time and full-time facilities time when I worked for British Telecom in the early 1980s.
Second, why on earth would BT management give me facilities time? Simply, because it worked, on balance, to facilitate a better working relationship between BT engineers and management. As a local official i sometimes opposed local, and national, management decisions and organised protests and industrial action. But the bulk of what I did was negotiate deals – on individual cases and wider working practices – that enabled BT to work better.
Sometimes this involved helping management to ease out workers who obviously needed to go, whilst making sure it was done with ‘due process’. Sometimes it meant rank-and-file engineers coming up with reform proposals that improved productivity. Sometimes it meant challenging daft management ideas that would have actually been harmful (there were quite few of those).
This is the sort of more collaborative approach to industrial relations that has served the German economy so well for decades.
I have to admit I’m a bit biased, because my first ever job was working as a lab-technician for ICI (now Astra-Zeneca). ICI, following the British General Strike in 1929, had adopted a policy of involving workers which persisted into the 1960s, when I joined them in 1969. This approach, known as “Mondism”, was fairly unique in the UK. It involved having no staff ‘classes’, regularly involving staff in consultations about working practices, and keeping staff well informed and open about strategies and projects.
I was working in a pharmaceuticals research and we’d have monthly meetings at which all the staff – including maintenance and catering staff – would be kept up to date on the major research projects. So everyone knew what they were contributing to, however indirectly. A very clever industrial strategy.
Instead, we now have in the 2010s the dominant idea, at least in government, that workers are ‘the enemy within’ (again) and everything should be done to degrade their status, wages, conditions and representation. Just how neanderthal can you get? (Sorry, that probably neanderthal-ist, they weren’t that stupid).

About Colin Talbot

Colin Talbot is a Professor of Government, a former Specialist Advisor to the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee and the Public Administration Select Committee and has appeared as expert witness many times in Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and NI Assembly. He's also advised Governments from the USA to Japan.

Our RSS feed

Receive our latest content and timely updates by subscribing to our RSS feed.

 Subscribe in your reader

More from this author

  • The UK after the Referendum: all that is solid melts into air…..
  • SR2015: £35bn on debt interest? But what about the £375bn held by the Bank of England?
  • SR2015: Spending: Is 36% of GDP still his target?

Become a contributor

Would you like to write for us on a public policy issue? Get in touch with a member of the team, ask for our editorial guidelines, or access our online training toolkit (UoM login required).

Disclaimer

Articles give the views of the author, and are not necessarily those of The University of Manchester.

Policy@Manchester

Manchester Policy Articles is an initiative from Policy@Manchester. Visit our web site to find out more

Contact Us

policy@manchester.ac.uk
t: +44 (0) 161 275 3038
The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Copyright © 2025 · Policy Blog 2 on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in