Policy@Manchester Articles

Expert insight, analysis and comment on key public policy issues

  • All Posts
  • UK Politics
  • Energy and Environment
  • Growth and Inclusion
  • Health and Social Care
  • Urban
  • Science and Engineering
Policy@Manchester Articles: Whitehall Watch
You are here: Home / Whitehall Watch / Paperless Assets and Assetless Paper – Why Only Government Can Make Capitalism Work

Paperless Assets and Assetless Paper – Why Only Government Can Make Capitalism Work

Colin Talbot By Colin Talbot Filed Under: Whitehall Watch Posted: October 12, 2011

The Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto has offered a very interesting twist on the western financial crisis. To summarize, he argues that the problem in the developing world is the translation of real, physical, assets into trabeable paper. This allows the raising of capital through loans, which lubricates capitalist development. The west, he suggests, now has the opposite problem – it has allowed the growth of lots of paper that has no clear relationship with real assets.

In short – the developing world has lots of assets but not enough paper whereas the West has too much paper that has no assets.

What de Soto does not say – at least not in so many words – is that only governments can resolve both these problems.

In the developing world only governments can legitimize property rights in the land, buildings, businesses and machinery that fuels so much of the shadow economy. Historically, in the USA for example as de Soto demonstrated in his seminal book “The Mystery of Capital”, it was the state that established and protected the property rights that enabled capitalist development. Developing country governments need to do the same now.

Conversely, it is the escape from proper state regulation that has allowed western financial interests to create “paper” – so called derivatives – that bear only a passing relationship to real assets. So complex and distant from real assets are these instruments that they no longer have credibility, especially when a crisis of confidence hits. Governments need to step in to guarantee these “assets” when they tank because they have become “too big to fail” – but they, Governments, need to have stopped this position developing in the first place and in the future.

Hernando de Soto’s analysis has been adopted by the free-market right, but they fail to note the true import of his analysis – that it implies the need for Governments to regulate and establish clearly the relationship between capital and the paper that represents it, something only Governments can do.

 

About Colin Talbot

Colin Talbot is a Professor of Government, a former Specialist Advisor to the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee and the Public Administration Select Committee and has appeared as expert witness many times in Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and NI Assembly. He's also advised Governments from the USA to Japan.

Our RSS feed

Receive our latest content and timely updates by subscribing to our RSS feed.

 Subscribe in your reader

More from this author

  • The UK after the Referendum: all that is solid melts into air…..
  • SR2015: £35bn on debt interest? But what about the £375bn held by the Bank of England?
  • SR2015: Spending: Is 36% of GDP still his target?

Become a contributor

Would you like to write for us on a public policy issue? Get in touch with a member of the team, ask for our editorial guidelines, or access our online training toolkit (UoM login required).

Disclaimer

Articles give the views of the author, and are not necessarily those of The University of Manchester.

Policy@Manchester

Manchester Policy Articles is an initiative from Policy@Manchester. Visit our web site to find out more

Contact Us

policy@manchester.ac.uk
t: +44 (0) 161 275 3038
The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Copyright © 2025 · Policy Blog 2 on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in