Policy@Manchester Articles

Expert insight, analysis and comment on key public policy issues

  • All Posts
  • UK Politics
  • Energy and Environment
  • Growth and Inclusion
  • Health and Social Care
  • Urban
  • Science and Engineering
Policy@Manchester Articles: Whitehall Watch
You are here: Home / Whitehall Watch / Curiouser and Curiouser – education and defence budgets

Curiouser and Curiouser – education and defence budgets

Colin Talbot By Colin Talbot Filed Under: Whitehall Watch Posted: October 15, 2010

Dramatic developments in the Spending Review: it appears that the Government is going to protect the schools budget, in real terms, and that Defence is probably only going to be cut by 10% rather than 25%. What does this mean?

[All figures are in this years prices].

Education: Spending on schools is between £35 and £50bn – so a real terms protection rather than a 25% cut represents about £8.75bn and £12.5bn a year by 2014-15.

If the pupil premium is extra, on top of this, it adds about £1.75bn a year, bringing the figures for displaced savings to totals of between £10.5bn and £14.25bn.

Defence: £36bn – so 25% would have been £9bn. If it is 10%, then it’s only £3.6bn, meaning that £5.4bn has to come from elsewhere.

Assuming the lowest Education figure, this means another £14bn has to be found from somewhere else – more than one and half times the Home Office (£9.4bn) or Justice Ministry (£9bn) budgets or the entire budget for Wales (£13.8bn) or almost half the entire local government budget (£26bn).

This makes the likelihood that government is going to deliver its target reductions more and more unlikely.

[PS – since I wrote this it has become apparent the Defence budget is only going to be cut by about 7%, meaning even larger savings have to found elsewhere. The consensus seems to be that the welfare budget will be the biggest victim – but of course promises to reduce welfare spending by getting people off benefits and into work are much easier to make than to deliver. More universal benefits, besides child benefit, may now also be in the firing line and will be justified by the need to protect schools and defence.]

About Colin Talbot

Colin Talbot is a Professor of Government, a former Specialist Advisor to the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee and the Public Administration Select Committee and has appeared as expert witness many times in Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and NI Assembly. He's also advised Governments from the USA to Japan.

Our RSS feed

Receive our latest content and timely updates by subscribing to our RSS feed.

 Subscribe in your reader

More from this author

  • The UK after the Referendum: all that is solid melts into air…..
  • SR2015: £35bn on debt interest? But what about the £375bn held by the Bank of England?
  • SR2015: Spending: Is 36% of GDP still his target?

Become a contributor

Would you like to write for us on a public policy issue? Get in touch with a member of the team, ask for our editorial guidelines, or access our online training toolkit (UoM login required).

Disclaimer

Articles give the views of the author, and are not necessarily those of The University of Manchester.

Policy@Manchester

Manchester Policy Articles is an initiative from Policy@Manchester. Visit our web site to find out more

Contact Us

policy@manchester.ac.uk
t: +44 (0) 161 275 3038
The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Copyright © 2025 · Policy Blog 2 on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in