Policy@Manchester Articles

Expert insight, analysis and comment on key public policy issues

  • All Posts
  • UK Politics
  • Energy and Environment
  • Growth and Inclusion
  • Health and Social Care
  • Urban
  • Science and Engineering
Policy@Manchester Articles: Whitehall Watch
You are here: Home / Whitehall Watch / Myths, half-myths and Spending Reviews

Myths, half-myths and Spending Reviews

Colin Talbot By Colin Talbot Filed Under: Whitehall Watch Posted: May 10, 2010

Sorry to be a stickler for details but a widespread myth emerged during the Election that the Labour government had “postponed” a Spending Review and “put it off until after the Election”.

So let’s try and tease out the truth – which as ever is more complex and fuzzy. When the whole concept of Spending Reviews was introduced, back in 1998, they were originally billed as setting public spending limits for government departments, or DEL in the jargon, for three year ahead (financial year’s 1999-2000 to 2001-02).

It soon became apparent that Spending Reviews were actually “three year plans reviewed every two years”, in a marvellous bit of Sir Humphrey-ish gobbledygook. Thus, after the first Spending Review in 1998 we had further reviews in 2000, 2002 and 2004. If this was the pattern then after the 2007 Spending Review there should have been a Spending Review 2009 – but there wasn’t.

But careful readers will have immediately spotted that the fifth Spending Review took place in 2007 – after three years – rather than in 2006, breaking the previous pattern.

One further detail – Spending Reviews have mostly been published in July for implementation in the next year’s Budget.

So there were two possibilities – either a two year Review published in July 2009 (two years) or July 2010 (three years).

The allegation that Labour “put off” a Spending Review only fully stands up if every previous Review were every two years, but that isn’t true. At best it is half-true. It is possible to accuse the Labour government of manipulating the timing of Reviews for political purposes (and unlike many of those now doing so, I have consistently since 2000) but you can’t claim that a 2009 SR really “due”. The truth is we didn’t know when an SR was “due” because, as usual, the Government hadn’t told us.

And one further thought – all three main parties are committed to keeping the Spending Reviews, but none have said clearly if they will be two, three or even four year reviews (some statements suggest the latter).

All of the above is of great amusement, if not bafflement, to the many international audiences I address who can’t believe that this isn’t all embedded in legislation and is so open to manipulation. The Government’s Fiscal Responsibility Act went some way to changing this, but we still don’t have a legally-based multi-year budget system. Watch this space…..

About Colin Talbot

Colin Talbot is a Professor of Government, a former Specialist Advisor to the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee and the Public Administration Select Committee and has appeared as expert witness many times in Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and NI Assembly. He's also advised Governments from the USA to Japan.

Our RSS feed

Receive our latest content and timely updates by subscribing to our RSS feed.

 Subscribe in your reader

More from this author

  • The UK after the Referendum: all that is solid melts into air…..
  • SR2015: £35bn on debt interest? But what about the £375bn held by the Bank of England?
  • SR2015: Spending: Is 36% of GDP still his target?

Become a contributor

Would you like to write for us on a public policy issue? Get in touch with a member of the team, ask for our editorial guidelines, or access our online training toolkit (UoM login required).

Disclaimer

Articles give the views of the author, and are not necessarily those of The University of Manchester.

Policy@Manchester

Manchester Policy Articles is an initiative from Policy@Manchester. Visit our web site to find out more

Contact Us

policy@manchester.ac.uk
t: +44 (0) 161 275 3038
The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Copyright © 2025 · Policy Blog 2 on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in