Policy@Manchester Articles

Expert insight, analysis and comment on key public policy issues

  • All Posts
  • UK Politics
  • Energy and Environment
  • Growth and Inclusion
  • Health and Social Care
  • Urban
  • Science and Engineering
Policy@Manchester Articles: Whitehall Watch
You are here: Home / Whitehall Watch / Tories IMF scare: towards a Chancer Chancellor?

Tories IMF scare: towards a Chancer Chancellor?

Colin Talbot By Colin Talbot Filed Under: Whitehall Watch Posted: April 21, 2010

Is the idea of an IMF intervention in Britain fact or fiction?  Simple answer: fiction, on just about every level.

First, Ken Clarke (endorsed later by George Osborne) said that if Britain couldn’t form a government the IMF would have to step in to impose a budget deficit reduction strategy. Ken Clarke and George Osborne may be many things, but they are clearly not scholars of international law and governance. The IMF cannot step in and impose anything without being asked by a government to lend it money – they are not some sort of World Government (despite the wilder fantasies of some ultra-leftists and conspiracy nuts). So the whole premise of the statement that if we have a hung parliament and can’t form a government, the IMF will step in, is complete nonsense.

Second, would the international markets go into complete panic because Britain had a hung parliament and took one or two weeks to sort out a government? Hardly. All the main parties are committed to reducing the public deficit over a reasonable time-frame and to reasonable levels, in the eyes of the markets, so why on earth would they panic? Whatever government finally emerged would be committed to public expenditure and deficit reduction plans that would broadly be acceptable to the markets.

Thirdly, the idea that our politicians would be incapable of forming a government is equally ludicrous. They might not like it, they will certainly squabble for a while, but they would all know that too much brinkmanship would fatally damage them politically in the eyes of the voters. Sooner rather than later they would have to accept the voters verdict that they don’t want one-party rule any more, but something different.

Ken Clarke is old enough and wily enough to know all this, even if George Osborne doesn’t. Ken was clearly just trying it on to create a little flurry of fear. George Osborne ought to have had the sense to play it down – the sort of thing that really scares markets is the idea we might end up with a Chancer Chancellor – Mr Osborne should be careful he doesn’t acquire this label.

About Colin Talbot

Colin Talbot is a Professor of Government, a former Specialist Advisor to the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee and the Public Administration Select Committee and has appeared as expert witness many times in Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and NI Assembly. He's also advised Governments from the USA to Japan.

Our RSS feed

Receive our latest content and timely updates by subscribing to our RSS feed.

 Subscribe in your reader

More from this author

  • The UK after the Referendum: all that is solid melts into air…..
  • SR2015: £35bn on debt interest? But what about the £375bn held by the Bank of England?
  • SR2015: Spending: Is 36% of GDP still his target?

Become a contributor

Would you like to write for us on a public policy issue? Get in touch with a member of the team, ask for our editorial guidelines, or access our online training toolkit (UoM login required).

Disclaimer

Articles give the views of the author, and are not necessarily those of The University of Manchester.

Policy@Manchester

Manchester Policy Articles is an initiative from Policy@Manchester. Visit our web site to find out more

Contact Us

policy@manchester.ac.uk
t: +44 (0) 161 275 3038
The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Copyright © 2025 · Policy Blog 2 on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in