Policy@Manchester Articles

Expert insight, analysis and comment on key public policy issues

  • All Posts
  • UK Politics
  • Energy and Environment
  • Growth and Inclusion
  • Health and Social Care
  • Urban
  • Science and Engineering
Policy@Manchester Articles: All posts
You are here: Home / All posts / SR2015: Spending: Is 36% of GDP still his target?
Banner image with Policy@Manchester visual branding

SR2015: Spending: Is 36% of GDP still his target?

Colin Talbot By Colin Talbot Filed Under: All posts Posted: November 25, 2015

[Rather than single blog I am posting a series of shorter posts on the Spending Review today on specific issues]

“Mr Speaker, I want to announce to the House that we are on target to meet our long-term economic plan of reducing the size of the British state to just 36%, putting firmly at the lower end of public spending in advanced economies. This will replace the long-term trend of public spending in the UK to be at around 43% of GDP, even under Conservative governments. By 2020 we will have fundamentally reduced the size of British Government.”

The above is what you will NOT hear from Chancellor George Osborne. Nor will you find anything like in the Conservative Party manifesto before the last election.

It is a perfectly legitimate political aim but not one the Tories have come clean about, but have concealed behind rhetoric about ‘balanced budgets’ and ‘deficit’ and ‘debt’ which is largely school-kid level economics.

So you will probably have to dig deep into the figures to see if this 36% target is still in George Osborne’s ‘Spending Review’. Indeed it is likely that you won’t find it in his figures, but in the report of the Office of Budget Responsibility.

It was there in his March Budget this year, before the General Election. It was there is his summer Budget after the General Election, as I have pointed out here and elsewhere.

Whether one agrees with this aim or not (which I do not) what is obviously wrong about this is that it has never been spelt out explicitly or put to a vote of the British people. Not exactly democratic is it?

UPDATE; the answer is yes. See this Table from the OBR – despite all the changes his target remains 36%.

CSRTABLE1

Tagged With: austerity, budget, George Osborne, spending review 2015

About Colin Talbot

Colin Talbot is a Professor of Government, a former Specialist Advisor to the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee and the Public Administration Select Committee and has appeared as expert witness many times in Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and NI Assembly. He's also advised Governments from the USA to Japan.

Our RSS feed

Receive our latest content and timely updates by subscribing to our RSS feed.

 Subscribe in your reader

More from this author

  • The UK after the Referendum: all that is solid melts into air…..
  • SR2015: £35bn on debt interest? But what about the £375bn held by the Bank of England?
  • Notes on the attacks in Paris

Become a contributor

Would you like to write for us on a public policy issue? Get in touch with a member of the team, ask for our editorial guidelines, or access our online training toolkit (UoM login required).

Disclaimer

Articles give the views of the author, and are not necessarily those of The University of Manchester.

Policy@Manchester

Manchester Policy Articles is an initiative from Policy@Manchester. Visit our web site to find out more

Contact Us

policy@manchester.ac.uk
t: +44 (0) 161 275 3038
The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Copyright © 2025 · Policy Blog 2 on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in